7 Comments

I worked in civil and criminal courts for 22 years. The testimony of an eye-witness is the most credible form of evidence. Anyone claiming it isn't is on the dark side.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your informed experience, that is useful

Expand full comment

What do you think about in family court? To me, it seemed like actual parents and anyone who is not a "neutral" professional is looked at with suspicion. If one parent alleges abuse, for example, it is quite possible, it seems to me, that the court professionals could just as easily paint the parent bringing up abuse as the abuser (parental alienation). If a family member or friend or acquaintance has anything to say, it seems like that is likewise potentially interpreted as suspicious or untrue, depending on how a judge or court professional decides to take it.

Expand full comment

In my personal opinion, most judges in family courts are in some way complicit in Luciferian child trafficking. When they are complicit, outcomes are predetermined. I knew a court reporter who gave up custody of her son to her ex-husband (and unjustly paid him child support) because she didn't want the child in family court after what she had seen there.

Expand full comment

I’ve been saying this for years. Unfortunately no one has ever believed me.

Expand full comment

Have you any links to what you have said or can you contact me on cathyfox @zoho.com ? many thanks

Expand full comment

Posts on social websites are the pointed spears that are going to take these dark entities away. I don’t care if the crime happened 30 years ago or 3000 years ago. The dark satanic humans that we live among are being exposed. The Internet is connecting psyches by the billions.

Expand full comment