Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sharine Borslien's avatar

So, FoxyFox, my question is this:

Am I wrong to write an article on my Substack which calls out an outfit like Balenciaga or (more recently) Gorsad Kyiv and show the actual photos that depict their evil doings?

A subscriber told me that he unsubscribed because I was *wrong* to include the photos from Gorsad Kyiv's Instagram account. He said that I should alter the photos (pixelate the children's faces) or just delete my post altogether, and added that my link was surely attracting "pederasts."

And here is my justification for keeping the post exactly as is:

If a schoolyard bully is abusing fellow students, wouldn't it be best to have photos of the victims' bruises, contusions, etc, as proof when seeking justice?

It is exhausting to to deal with government tyrants, the burgeoning mass of psychopaths, and a corrupted justice system ON TOP OF speaking out against horrific abuses in this truly SICK society of allowing EVERYTHING to be OKAY.

Sorry to be so early 2000s, but . . . I CAN'T EVEN!

Expand full comment
SableNixe's avatar

Incredible research as always. I think the view from 35,000 feet is that if social networking functionality is possible, people will find a way to leverage the platform for CP.

Metaverse and AI art-generation systems are going to be horrific.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts